eWire News

World

Canada to impose matching tariffs on US goods September 8

Trump said Canada wants statehood benefits 'without being one' after talks collapsed and 50 percent US duties took effect.

7 min read

Prime Minister Mark Carney speaking at a podium during a news conference in Ottawa
Photo by Rokas91 | Dreamstime.com

President Donald Trump said Canada 'wants the benefits' of being a U.S. state 'without being one,' his first public response to the collapse of trade talks that pushed 50 percent U.S. tariffs onto a range of Canadian goods over the weekend.

The remark landed in a brief post on his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Sunday, August 23. 'Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one!!!' he wrote, adding that Canada had charged American farmers 'massive amounts of Tariffs' for many years. He signed off with 'No more!!!'

Prime Minister Mark Carney had announced a day earlier that Canada would answer with retaliatory duties of its own, effective September 8, matching the U.S. measures 'dollar for dollar' in order, he said, to protect Canadian workers, farmers, families and businesses. There was no immediate reaction from the Canadian government to Trump's statehood remark, which arrived before most of the country was awake.

What broke down in Washington

Negotiations between the two governments fell apart late on Friday, August 21, in Washington, after weeks of talks that officials on both sides had at points described as close to a deal. Trump had granted Canada a three-day extension to reach terms, and top trade officials stayed in direct contact through the week, at times signaling an agreement was near. The failure, described by Axios as an unprecedented breakdown in relations with the second-largest U.S. trading partner, triggered tariffs set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on Saturday, August 22.

Carney said Canadian negotiators walked away after the Trump administration made 'unacceptable' demands, including restrictions on Canada's ability to strike trade deals with other countries. In recent days, he said, the United States had proposed terms that were 'uneconomic, unfair, and undermined the net benefits for Canada.' 'In short, they asked too much, and they offered too little,' Carney told reporters, calling the fresh tariffs a 'miscalculation' meant to 'hurt and divide us.'

U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer placed the blame on Ottawa, saying Canada had 'declined to finalize the trade deal under the terms agreed earlier this week.' New demands and reversals by Canada, he said, had 'upended the careful balance reached in the past days.' Trump had earlier postponed an original Wednesday deadline, saying at the time that a deal was close to being finalized.

Canada had put concessions on the table, including dropping retaliatory measures imposed last year and returning U.S. alcohol to Canadian store shelves. The sticking points, CNN reported, included the auto sector and critical minerals, on which Carney said Canada would never grant the United States 'exclusive access.'

A tariff law untouched since 1930

To impose the additional 50 percent duties, Trump invoked Section 338 of the Tariff Act of 1930, a mechanism that appears never to have been used to impose tariffs since the law took effect that year. The tariffs cover about $20 billion worth of goods, roughly 5.5 percent of Canadian exports to the United States, and do not apply to goods already carrying Section 232 duties, including steel, aluminum and copper.

The affected products run from wine, furniture and clothing to cement, fishing rods and hockey equipment, with hockey sticks among the items now facing the higher rate. The administration carved out several of Canada's largest exports, including energy, potash and critical minerals, from the new levies, sparing the sectors most central to cross-border supply chains.

Canada has what the world wants. And we will not allow any nation to determine our future.

Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada

Carney also criticized what he described as Washington's shifting justifications for the tariffs, pointing to Trump's citing of drug trafficking, television advertisements and wildfire smoke as reasons for higher duties. 'You're at war when you get attacked. We got attacked,' the prime minister told reporters in Ottawa.

Retaliation aimed at steel and dairy

Canada's counter-tariffs, set for September 8, will target U.S. steel, dairy, appliances, agricultural equipment, pulp, paper and electronics, Carney said, with the government promising to match the U.S. measures dollar for dollar. Ottawa said it would set out further detail in the coming days on how the duties would apply and which specific goods would be hit.

Canada sends about three-quarters of its merchandise exports to the United States, which makes the escalation especially heavy for Canadian industries and workers. Carney is among the few world leaders to retaliate against U.S. tariffs, and he has pledged to build new trade and military alliances to reduce that dependence. He has cast the dispute as a defense of Canadian sovereignty rather than a narrow argument about tariffs.

The 50 percent levy also hits some products that had been shielded under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement, raising questions about the pact's future. USMCA took effect in 2020 in place of NAFTA and remains in force, though its prospects dimmed after the United States declined to renew it during the 2026 joint review, according to Newsweek.

Trump's reference to American farmers ties to a long-running grievance over Canada's supply-management system for dairy, poultry and eggs, which caps imports through quotas and imposes steep tariffs on volumes above them. He criticized the system repeatedly during the original talks over the USMCA, arguing it unfairly limited access for U.S. producers. Canada does admit American dairy, but only within quota limits, above which the duties become prohibitively high.

Statehood talk with a long history

Trump has pressed the idea that Canada should become the 51st state since returning to office in 2025, and he again referred to Carney as 'the future Governor of Canada.' In September 2025 he told military officials at Marine Corps Base Quantico that Canada could join the United States and its planned Golden Dome missile defense system. He has said Canada 'would cease to exist as a country' if the United States stopped buying its goods, and insisted he was 'not just trolling' with the idea.

During a meeting with the president, Carney told Trump that Canada was 'not for sale' and 'won't be for sale ever.' Trump replied, 'Never say never.' In June 2026, he shared an article about Canada's economy with the message '51st State!' The previous year, on Canada's federal election day, he had trolled voters on Truth Social by suggesting he was on the ballot and urging them to make Canada 'the cherished 51st State.'

Ontario Premier Doug Ford rejected that framing at the time, saying Canada 'will never be the 51st state' and 'is not for sale.' Ford backed Carney's refusal to sign a deal this weekend, telling reporters, 'I'm glad he didn't sign that deal because it was a bad deal.'

Where the public stands on annexation

Public opinion on the annexation question has hardened against it on both sides of the border. A Research Co. survey conducted in early June found 63 percent of Americans think Canada should remain an independent nation, down three points since January, while Trump's approval rating stood at 38 percent. Support for the idea has fallen even as the president has repeated it.

An Ipsos poll conducted in September 2025 found core Canadian opposition to statehood at 79 percent. The share of Canadians who saw Trump's '51st state' rhetoric as a serious threat to sovereignty fell 17 points, from 48 percent to 31 percent, since early 2025, with the drop steepest among the young: Gen Z fell from 70 percent to 38 percent. Support for joining with full citizenship and currency conversion dropped 14 points, to 16 percent.

  • Angus Reid finds nine in 10 Canadians would vote no on joining
  • Leger poll shows 56 percent of Canadians want no further concessions
  • Angus Reid finds about one in five Conservative supporters would vote yes
  • Ipsos records national pride tied to the idea slipping to 72 percent

Even within Trump's own base, the proposal has thin support. In an Angus Reid Institute survey from March 2025, 44 percent of Trump voters said they had no interest in seeing Canada join, and 42 percent said they would consider it only if Canadians themselves wanted it. On the Canadian side, 54 percent said they believed Trump was serious about annexation, up from 32 percent two months earlier, even as their opposition held firm.

President Trump has some obsessive ideas, and that is one. It's not a joke. It's his very strong desire to make this happen.

Mark Carney, Prime Minister of Canada, speaking in April 2025

Former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has described the tariffs as an attempt to 'collapse' the Canadian economy and ease the path to annexation. The political arithmetic runs against Trump's own party: an integrated Canada would be the most populous state, and academic estimates put its delegation at about 54 House members and two senators, most likely aligned with Democrats.

What happens before September 8

The next flashpoint is September 8, when Canada's retaliatory duties take effect unless the two governments return to the table. Carney said Ottawa would release further details on those measures in the days ahead. Neither leader has publicly proposed a fresh round of talks since the negotiations broke down.

Before the collapse, the United States had weighed easing some of its existing duties, reportedly considering halving the 50 percent rate on Canadian steel and aluminum and cutting the 25 percent tariff on Canadian cars to 15 percent, according to CNN. Those discussions ended when the talks failed.

For now, the two largest trading partners in North America face the steepest barriers between them in years. Energy, potash and critical minerals remain the main exceptions, and the fate of the broader USMCA framework will stay unclear until the retaliatory tariffs take hold and both governments decide whether to talk again. On the statehood question, the polling on both sides of the border points the same way: away from it.

Sources

Next from the wire

Weekday mornings, 7:00 ET

The Current

What moved overnight and what's ahead, in five minutes. Free. One click to stop.